Skip to content

ballasts v

January 21, 2009

still life, Jan Davidsz de Heem (1606-1684)
1
The essential nature of another, namely me,
filled me and I could see what was lacking within:
a new modulation, trajectories devoid of sound or colour,
an imaginary series of almost enlightening concepts.
The true value of this spectacle was
that nothing was happening.

2
We got together.
We read texts, texts in the pure state,
we could not grasp their meaning, origin nor purpose.
We were swept away, worn away
until effaced before these extraordinary nonexistent texts.
Each was alone and at home,
assuring the permanent absence of this conversation.

3
I took part in an effort
to smash all that was coherent within me
before withdrawing from this tumult,
in other words before glimpsing the effort itself.
The fleeting idea of being unable to return prevented
the effort from even being conceived,
and, being inconceivable, nothing remained of this revolt.

4
“Enough of this lucidity, of this dead
weight, don’t say anything, enough.”
He didn’t reply.
I continued:
“Why invite me to seek myself?
What is already here appears guilty
and disturbing enough.”

He didn’t reply.

5
You who have not experienced this atrocious
mutilation of what isn’t, of the sourceless energy,
as I am not you, you are unaware of my suffering,
of this self cutting through a thick transparency
towards the true hermetic anguish—inaccessible, almost a fantasy.

André Dalmas
tr. Michael Tweed
(original French text)

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: